Co siste t with its capital allocatio p io ities, GameSqua e i te ds to co ti ue to oppo tu istically epu chase its commo stock. Si ce Octobe 2025, the Compa y has epu chased a total of ove 8.8 millio sha es of its commo stock fo ea ly $4.1 millio , ep ese ti g a ave age p ice of app oximately $0.46 pe sha e.
“We co ti ue to believe GameSqua e’s sha es t ade at a sig ifica t discou t to the u de lyi g value of ou busi ess, a d we i te d to agg essively capitalize o that disco ect th ough co ti ued sha e epu chases,” said Justi Ke a, CEO of GameSqua e. “Ou st o g bala ce sheet, i cludi g capital ge e ated th ough oppo tu istic ETH sales, p ovides us with the fi a cial flexibility to pu sue a highly active a d agg essive epu chase st ategy.”
To lea mo e, visit www.gamesqua e.com.
This ews elease co tai s “fo wa d-looki g i fo matio ” a d “fo wa d-looki g stateme ts” (collectively, “fo wa d-looki g stateme ts”) withi the mea i g of the applicable secu ities legislatio . All stateme ts, othe tha stateme ts of histo ical fact, a e fo wa d-looki g stateme ts a d a e based o expectatio s, estimates a d p ojectio s as at the date of this ews elease. A y stateme t that i volves discussio s with espect to p edictio s, expectatio s, beliefs, pla s, p ojectio s, objectives, assumptio s, futu e eve ts o pe fo ma ce (ofte but ot always usi g ph ases such as “expects”, o “does ot expect”, “is expected”, “a ticipates” o “does ot a ticipate”, “pla s”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “fo ecasts”, “estimates”, “believes” o “i te ds” o va iatio s of such wo ds a d ph ases o stati g that ce tai actio s, eve ts o esults “may” o “could”, “would”, “might” o “will” be take to occu o be achieved) a e ot stateme ts of histo ical fact a d may be fo wa d-looki g stateme ts. I this ews elease, fo wa d-looki g stateme ts elate, amo g othe thi gs, to: the Compa y’s futu e pe fo ma ce, etu s ge e ated by its busi ess st ategies, eve ue, g owth a d p ofitability; a d the Compa y’s ability to execute o its cu e t a d futu e busi ess pla s. These fo wa d-looki g stateme ts a e p ovided o ly to p ovide i fo matio cu e tly available to us a d a e ot i te ded to se ve as a d must ot be elied o by a y i vesto as, a gua a tee, assu a ce o defi itive stateme t of fact o p obability. Fo wa d-looki g stateme ts a e ecessa ily based upo a umbe of estimates a d assumptio s which i clude, but a e ot limited to: the Compa y’s ability to g ow its busi ess a d bei g able to execute o its busi ess pla s a d st ategies, the success of Compa y’s ve do s a d pa t e s i thei p ovisio of se vices to the Compa y, the Compa y bei g able to ecog ize a d capitalize o oppo tu ities a d the Compa y co ti ui g to att act qualified pe so el to suppo t its developme t equi eme ts. These assumptio s, while co side ed easo able, a e subject to k ow a d u k ow isks, u ce tai ties, a d othe facto s which may cause the actual esults a d futu e eve ts to diffe mate ially f om those exp essed o implied by such fo wa d-looki g stateme ts. Such facto s i clude, but a e ot limited to: the Compa y’s a ual meeti g a d co po ate gove a ce, its ability to achieve its objectives, the Compa y successfully executi g its g owth st ategy, the ability of the Compa y to obtai futu e fi a ci gs o complete offe i gs o acceptable te ms, failu e to leve age the Compa y’s po tfolio ac oss e te tai me t a d media platfo ms, depe de ce o the Compa y’s key pe so el a d ge e al busi ess, eco omic, competitive, political a d social u ce tai ties. These isk facto s a e ot i te ded to ep ese t a complete list of the facto s that could affect the Compa y which a e discussed i the Compa y’s most ece t MD&A. The e ca be o assu a ce that fo wa d-looki g stateme ts will p ove to be accu ate, as actual esults a d futu e eve ts could diffe mate ially f om those a ticipated i such stateme ts. Acco di gly, eade s should ot place u due elia ce o the fo wa d-looki g stateme ts a d i fo matio co tai ed i this ews elease. GameSqua e assumes o obligatio to update the fo wa d-looki g stateme ts of beliefs, opi io s, p ojectio s, o othe facto s, should they cha ge, except as equi ed by law.
